Justice Delivered: A Week That Changed a Nation

by William Rivers Pitt, Truthout | Op-Ed –

Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, John G. Roberts, Anthony M. Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, Smauel Alito Jr., Elena Kagan

“And Lord, we lifted over the delta, feelin’ alright,
carried together on the broad, unbroken back of the blues.”
—Rebecca Meredith

A couple of weeks ago, I was on a planet called Earth, a citizen of the United States, and a prisoner of sorry judgments levied by fools whose political existence is funded through the extravagant largesse of those who sup on hate and greed.

That was my Earth, and my country, and if I despised the manner in which the pieces of what passes for “culture” and “justice” and “government” came together like a jigsaw puzzle left out in the rain, at least I recognized it. It was familiar.

…and then something like last week happens, and all of a sudden, I don’t know what planet I’m on anymore. In a small space of days, this nation’s highest court confirmed that everyone can get health insurance for a fee, tore a large chunk out of the federal “three strikes” criminal sentencing law, saved the Fair Housing Act of 1968, and gifted all the people of this nation, which prides itself on freedom, the actual freedom to marry as they wish. This particular portion of a long-enduring prohibition that finds its justification in Bronze-Age Biblical morality, and presumes upon that dusty premise to dictate the letter of the law, was ended before noon on Friday.

It didn’t go over easy. After the ACA ruling, Ted Cruz and Mike Huckabee, both of whom are GOP presidential candidates, each erupted with spittle-flecked rants about the “tyranny” of “un-elected judges” making decisions on cases brought through due process of law to the bench. Justice Antonin Scalia was so despondent over the ruling that he declared words no longer have meaning, and the governor of Mississippi accused the whole thing of being a “socialist takeover” of the United States.

The “un-elected judges” bit deserves some attention, because we’re all going to be hearing more of it. When the Supreme Court decreed that comprehensive political bribery and corruption by way of unfettered campaign contributions was the law of the land, via their Citizens United decision, no one puled about “un-elected judges.” When minority voting rights were eviscerated, there was nary a peep about “un-elected judges.” Now that gay people can legally bind in love and commitment, however, those “un-elected judges” are suddenly intolerable.

“In order to provide the people themselves with a constitutional remedy to the problem of judicial activism and the means for throwing off judicial tyrants,” wrote Ted Cruz in the National Review, “I am proposing an amendment to the United States Constitution that would subject the justices of the Supreme Court to periodic judicial-retention elections.” Bobby Jindal, for his part, actually managed to out-fail Mr Cruz. “If we want to save some money,” he said, “let’s just get rid of the court.”

Talk about temper tantrums.

This mealy-mouthed duplicity even reaches the heady atmosphere of that high bench, evidenced by none other than Chief Justice Roberts, hero to ACA advocates and scourge of those who wanted that law struck down. Roberts voted against legalizing gay marriage, and in his dissent, he went Full Frontal Scalia: “Five lawyers have closed the debate and enacted their own vision of marriage as a matter of constitutional law. Stealing this issue from the people will for many cast a cloud over same-sex marriage, making a dramatic social change that much more difficult to accept.”

read more…..   http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/31629-justice-delivered-a-week-that-changed-a-nation

 

Reprinted with permission from Truthout